Radiological Liver Volumetry and its Impact on Surgical Decision-Making and Post-Hepatectomy Liver Failure. A Clinical Study

Authors

  • RABIAA MAHMOOD ALI Consultant Radiologist Mukhtar A Sheikh Hospital, Multan
  • MUHAMMAD ATIQ Assistant Professor Bakhtawar Amin Medical and dental College Multan
  • MARIA AFZAL BODLA Senior Registrar Lahore General Hospital, Lahore
  • MUHAMMAD HABIB HASSAN House Officer Bakhtawar Amin Medical and Dental College Multan
  • UMAIR KHAN SHERWANI Assistant Professor Multan Medical and Dental College Multan
  • SIDRAH MAHMOOD Consultant Radiologist MINAR Cancer Hospital, Multan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs020231712744

Keywords:

Liver volumetry, future liver remnant, hepatectomy, post-hepatectomy liver failure, surgical planning.

Abstract

Background: Post hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) has been an important morbidity and mortality cause after liver resection. The preoperative evaluation of the hepatic reserve must be accurately conducted to ensure the correct planning of the surgery and elimination of postoperative complications. Radiological liver volumes have become a useful method to predict future liver remnant (FLR) and maximize surgeries.

Objective: To assess how radiological liver volumetry can influence the surgical planning and its correlation with the occurrence of post-hepatectomy liver failure in patients that undergo elective hepatectomy.

Methods: This was a prospective clinical trial study where 100 patients undergoing an elective liver resection surgery at a tertiary care unit were included. Preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography-based liver volumetry was carried out on all patients to determine the total liver volume, planned resection volume and FLR. In making decisions in surgery relating to the degree of hepatectomy, volumetric findings were used in conjunction with clinical and biochemical parameters. The liver functions after the surgery were controlled, and PHLF was evaluated according to the standard criteria. The statistical associations were used to determine the relationship between FLR and PHLF.

Results: As an average, the liver remnant was found to be 62.3 ± 9.8. Forty-six percent of the patients had major hepatectomy, and 54 percent minor resections. A liver failure post- hepatectomy was seen in 18 percent of the patients with majority being mild to moderate cases. Patients who suffered FLR <60% showed a high incidence of PHLF than those who suffered FLR ≥60% (38.9% vs. 6.3, p < 0.05). Postoperative liver failure had strong relationships with lower FLR values and intrinsic chronic liver disease.

Conclusion: Radiologic liver volumetry is important and dependable preoperative risk stratification and surgical planning tool in hepatectomy. Proper evaluation of the future liver remnant would greatly decrease future hepatectomy liver failure and would help to develop personalized and safer hepatic surgery.

References

Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Brooke-Smith M, Crawford M, Adam R, et al. Posthepatectomy liver failure: A definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). Surgery. 2011;149(5):713–724. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2010.10.001

Shoup M, Gonen M, D’Angelica M, Jarnagin WR, DeMatteo RP, Schwartz LH, et al. Volumetric analysis predicts hepatic dysfunction in patients undergoing major liver resection. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003;7(3):325–330. doi:10.1016/S1091-255X(02)00370-8

Vauthey JN, Abdalla EK, Doherty DA, Gertsch P, Fenstermacher MJ, Loyer EM, et al. Body surface area and body weight predict total liver volume in Western adults. Liver Transpl. 2002;8(3):233–240. doi:10.1053/jlts.2002.31654

Abdalla EK, Hicks ME, Vauthey JN. Portal vein embolization: Rationale, technique and future prospects. Br J Surg. 2001;88(2):165–175. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01657.x

Clavien PA, Petrowsky H, DeOliveira ML, Graf R. Strategies for safer liver surgery and partial liver transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(15):1545–1559. doi:10.1056/NEJMra065156

Ribero D, Abdalla EK, Madoff DC, Donadon M, Loyer EM, Vauthey JN. Portal vein embolization before major hepatectomy and its effects on regeneration, resectability and outcome. Br J Surg. 2007;94(11):1386–1394. doi:10.1002/bjs.5836

Makuuchi M, Thai BL, Takayasu K, Takayama T, Kosuge T, Gunvén P, et al. Preoperative portal embolization to increase safety of major hepatectomy for hilar bile duct carcinoma. Surgery. 1990;107(5):521–527.

Zappa M, Dondero F, Sibert A, Vullierme MP, Belghiti J, Vilgrain V. Liver volumetry by computed tomography in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing liver resection. Eur Radiol. 2009;19(10):2442–2448. doi:10.1007/s00330-009-1415-4

Lim MC, Tan CH, Cai J, Zheng J, Kow AW. CT volumetry of the liver: Where does it stand in clinical practice? Clin Radiol. 2014;69(9):887–895. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2014.04.010

Truant S, Oberlin O, Sergent G, Lebuffe G, Gambiez L, Ernst O, et al. Remnant liver volume to body weight ratio ≥0.5%: A new cut-off to estimate postoperative risk after extended hepatectomy in non-cirrhotic liver. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(1):22–33. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.09.007

Hwang S, Lee SG, Kim KH, Ahn CS, Moon DB, Ha TY, et al. Role of computed tomography volumetry in living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2007;13(6):822–829. doi:10.1002/lt.21078

Hoekstra LT, van Lienden KP, Doets A, Busch OR, Gouma DJ, van Gulik TM. Tumor progression after preoperative portal vein embolization. Ann Surg. 2012;256(5):812–818. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318272df4a

Reissfelder C, Rahbari NN, Koch M, Kofler B, Sutedja N, Büchler MW, et al. Postoperative course and clinical significance of posthepatectomy liver failure after hepatic resection. Ann Surg. 2011;254(2):289–295. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182263913

Cucchetti A, Cescon M, Ercolani G, di Gioia P, Peri E, Pinna AD. Safety of hepatic resection in cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2011;254(2):279–287. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31822638d6

van den Broek MA, Olde Damink SW, Dejong CH, Lang H, Malagó M, Jalan R, et al. Liver failure after partial hepatic resection: Definition, pathophysiology, risk factors and treatment. Liver Int. 2008;28(6):767–780. doi:10.1111/j.1478-3231.2008.01777.x

Kokudo N, Shindoh J. How can we improve the safety of major hepatectomy? Ann Surg. 2019;269(3):516–517. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000003045

Schindl MJ, Redhead DN, Fearon KC, Garden OJ, Wigmore SJ. The value of residual liver volume as a predictor of hepatic dysfunction and infection after major liver resection. Gut. 2005;54(2):289–296. doi:10.1136/gut.2004.046524

Kishi Y, Abdalla EK, Chun YS, Zorzi D, Madoff DC, Wallace MJ, et al. Three hundred and one consecutive extended right hepatectomies: Evaluation of outcome based on systematic liver volumetry. Ann Surg. 2009;250(4):540–548. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b5fd40

Li J, Miao XY, Wang GY, Zheng J, Wu H. Preoperative CT volumetry for prediction of post-hepatectomy liver failure: A systematic review. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(46):8217–8228. doi:10.3748/wjg.v23.i46.8217

Zarzavadjian Le Bian A, Dokmak S, Aussilhou B, Farges O, Belghiti J. Functional liver remnant assessment in hepatectomy: The role of imaging. HPB (Oxford). 2020;22(2):181–189. doi:10.1016/j.hpb.2019.07.007

Downloads

Crossmark - Check for Updates

How to Cite

ALI, R. M., ATIQ, M., BODLA, M. A., HASSAN, M. H., SHERWANI, U. K., & MAHMOOD, S. (2023). Radiological Liver Volumetry and its Impact on Surgical Decision-Making and Post-Hepatectomy Liver Failure. A Clinical Study. Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences, 17(12), 744. https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs020231712744