Clinical Predictors of Symptomatic Versus Asymptomatic Hiatus Hernia in Adults. A Cross-Sectional Analysis

Authors

  • MUHAMMAD ZAIN UL ABADIN Punjab Medical College, Faisalabad, Pakistan
  • HUMA FATIMA Shalamar Medical and Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan
  • HAFIZ MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH Oncology Department, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan
  • FARRUKH RAFAQAT College of Allied Health Sciences, Akhtar Saeed Medical and Dental College (AMDC), Lahore, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs020251910.4

Keywords:

Hiatus hernia, symptomatic hernia, asymptomatic hernia, esophagitis, BMI, hernia size, gastroesophageal reflux, clinical predictors.

Abstract

Background: Hiatus hernia is a widely encountered gastrointestinal disorder that could have negative or positive symptomology. The determinants of the occurrence of symptoms amongst the patients are not clear. This research was to find clinical predictors of the difference between symptomatic and asymptomatic hiatus hernia in adults.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was done on 100 patients (adults) who had been diagnosed with hiatus hernia on either endoscopy or barium swallow. Clinical evaluation had been used to classify patients as symptomatic (n=62) and asymptomatic (n=38). Demographic data, body mass index correction (BMI), smoking condition, hernia type, and hernia size and existence of esophagitis were taken. Chi-square tests, independent t-tests, and logistic regression were the statistical tests that were used to determine independent predictors of developing the symptoms.

Results: BMI (29.6 3.9 vs 26.8 4.2; p=0.002), hernia size (3.4 cm 1.1 vs 2.6 cm 0.8; p=0.001) and esophagitis prevalence (53.2 vs 23.7; p=0.004) were significantly greater in symptomatic patients. Smoking demonstrated a tendency of association, and was not a predictor independently. BMI (OR=1.21, p=0.003), hernia size (OR=1.94, p=0.001) and esophagitis (OR=2.67, p=0.013) were found significant independent predictors of symptomatic presentation using logistic regression.

Conclusion: Increased BMI, greater size of hernia and the presence of esophagitis plays significant role in increasing the probability of symptomatic hiatus hernia in the adult population. These predictors can be used to identify a person at high risk at an early stage, personalized lifestyle change, and even better clinical management approaches.

References

Kahrilas PJ, Kim HC, Pandolfino JE. Approaches to the diagnosis and grading of hiatal hernia. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2015;29(1):17-29. doi:10.1016/j.bpg.2015.03.002

Hyun JJ, Bak YT. Clinical significance of hiatal hernia. Gut Liver. 2015;9(5):667-674. doi:10.5009/gnl14453

Andolfi C, Jalilvand A, Plana A, Fisichella PM. Hiatal hernia: a review of diagnostic and management strategies. J Surg Res. 2016;205(2):386-395. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.033

Wu JC. Gastroesophageal reflux disease: An Asian perspective. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;31(1):1-8. doi:10.1111/jgh.13151

Stylopoulos N, Auyang E, Rattner D. The relationship between obesity and hiatal hernia. Ann Surg. 2015;261(3):574-582. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000000850

Schlottmann F, Herbella FA, Patti MG. Understanding the pathophysiology of GERD: an update. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017;402(6):749-758. doi:10.1007/s00423-017-1631-0

Hampel H, Abraham NS, El-Serag HB. Meta-analysis of obesity and the risk of GERD. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112(3):359-368. doi:10.1038/ajg.2016.556

Lin S, Kahrilas PJ, Xiao Y, Nicodème F. The effect of hiatal hernia on reflux. Gastroenterology. 2016;150(5):A33. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2015.10.040

Schlottmann F, Patti MG. Hiatal hernia and reflux disease: correlation between size and symptoms. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2018;27(4):183-188. doi:10.1080/13645706.2017.1392813

Furnari M, Savarino E, de Bortoli N, Martinucci I, Frazzoni M. Reflux and esophagitis in hiatal hernia patients. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017;29(3):e12913. doi:10.1111/nmo.12913

Fuchs KH, Babic B, Breithaupt W, Varga G. Symptom patterns in sliding vs paraesophageal hiatal hernia. World J Surg. 2017;41(2):476-483. doi:10.1007/s00268-016-3718-0

Kahrilas PJ, Quigley EM. Pathophysiology of GERD. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111(2):135-137. doi:10.1038/ajg.2015.377

Lee YY, Mahadeva S. Gastroesophageal reflux disease in Asia: disease burden and risk factors. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017;29(5):e13031. doi:10.1111/nmo.13031

Patel A, Sayuk GS, Gyawali CP. Esophagitis severity and symptom correlation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15(3):411-417. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2016.06.006

Herbella FA, Vicentine FP, Patti MG. GERD symptoms in relation to hernia type. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018;22(1):1-6. doi:10.1007/s11605-017-3549-z

Su L, Xu J, Zhou Q. Risk factors for symptomatic hiatal hernia: a clinical analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(27):e16134. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000016134

Jain D, Singhal S. Predictors of GERD symptoms in hiatal hernia patients. Esophagus. 2018;15(3):190-197. doi:10.1007/s10388-017-0606-5

Sweis R, Fox M. The role of obesity and hernia size in reflux patterns. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2017;33(4):282-288. doi:10.1097/MOG.0000000000000370

Bennett C, Vakil N. Symptom–anatomy mismatch in GERD and hiatal hernia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18(1):80-88. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2019.03.044

Schlottmann F, Patti MG. Modern understanding of hiatal hernia; predictors of symptomatic disease. Ann Esophagus. 2021;4(1):1-7. doi:10.21037/aoe-20-75

Downloads

Crossmark - Check for Updates

How to Cite

ABADIN, M. Z. U., HUMA FATIMA, ABDULLAH, H. M. ., & RAFAQAT, F. (2025). Clinical Predictors of Symptomatic Versus Asymptomatic Hiatus Hernia in Adults. A Cross-Sectional Analysis. Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences, 19(10), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs020251910.4