Comparison of Laproscopic Burnia Technique Versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Needle Herniotomy for Inguinal Hernia Repair in Female Pediatric Patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs02024181207Abstract
Objectives: To compare operative outcomes of the Burnia technique versus laparoscopic-assisted needle herniotomy in female pediatric patients with inguinal hernias.
Study Settings: Department of Paediatric Surgery, Sahiwal Teaching Hospital, Sahiwal.
Duration of Study: From May 2023 to November 2023.
Data Collection: This randomized controlled trial(RCT) was conducted on 80 female children aged 1–12 years with unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernias. Participants were randomized equally into two groups: Group A underwent laparoscopic-assisted needle herniotomy, while Group B received the Burnia technique. Operative time, recurrence, and scar visibility were recorded. Follow-up was conducted at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively to note the outcome of both techniques.
Results: The mean operative time was significantly shorter in the Burnia group (25.43 ± 7.74 minutes) compared to the needle herniotomy group (30.99 ± 9.04 minutes; p = 0.004). Recurrence occurred in 10.0% of Group A and 2.5% of Group B patients (p = 0.166). Visible scarring was significantly lower in the Burnia group (17.5%) than in the needle herniotomy group (42.5%; p = 0.015).
Conclusion: The Burnia technique is a safe and effective sutureless alternative with reduced operative time and improved cosmetic outcomes.
Keywords: Burnia technique, pediatric hernia, laparoscopy, sutureless repair, needle herniotomy
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Yasir Makki, Muhammad Saad Zulfiqar, Syed Asif Hussain Shah, Mushtaq Ahmad, Rao Riaz Ul Haq, Aizaz Haider Khan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.